The college football landscape is evolving, and it's time to tap into a new gold mine. Joseph Goodman, a renowned sports columnist, argues that the future of college football lies in expanding postseason games and revenue streams. He proposes a bold idea: a National Invitational Tournament (NIT) for college football, similar to the one in basketball.
Goodman's proposal is a game-changer. He suggests expanding the College Football Playoff to 24 teams, but why stop there? He envisions a 36-team NIT, where all games are played on campus, and every team, regardless of their regular-season performance, gets a chance to compete. This would democratize college football and create a more inclusive postseason.
The key to this idea is revenue sharing. Players would receive half of the revenue generated, ensuring they benefit from the success of the tournament. Goodman highlights the potential for creative partnerships, such as paying players to star in commercials during timeouts, following the example of the Savannah Bananas. This approach could attract more attention and generate additional income.
The author challenges the notion that fewer games are better, especially for sports reporters. He argues that more games mean more opportunities for coverage and excitement. The proposed 76-team NCAA Tournament, which has faced criticism, will likely attract viewers and create more Cinderella stories. Goodman believes that expansion will enhance the quality of college basketball, as more European players join and future pros stay in college longer due to revenue sharing.
In the context of college football, Goodman sees an opportunity for struggling teams like UAB. A pay-for-play NIT could provide a platform for these teams to gain recognition and potentially keep players in the program. It's a win-win situation, as it offers more games and revenue while promoting inclusivity.
However, Goodman acknowledges that this idea may face resistance. Some may cringe at the thought of five-loss teams participating in an 'also-ran' tournament. Yet, he argues that the same people who enjoy the Pop-Tarts Bowl will eventually embrace the concept. The key is to create a fun and engaging experience, similar to the ethos of the Savannah Bananas.
In conclusion, Goodman's proposal to expand postseason games in college football is a bold and innovative idea. It has the potential to revolutionize the sport, provide more opportunities for players, and create a more inclusive and exciting experience for fans. While it may face challenges, the benefits of a college football NIT could be transformative, and it's time to explore this untapped gold mine.
